# Literature mapped to the lesson

Date searched: 2026-10-14.
Structure: Chapters 1–4 and Appendix A.

E = a read primary abstract or full text supports the statement.
I = an explicit inference from identified premises.
? = a preserved citation or unreviewed lead.
Article records distinguish these evidence levels individually.

## Chapter 1 — Cavity pressure, inertia, and directional jets

The existing mechanics chain uses Rayleigh, Cooker–Peregrine, and Supponen.
Peters supplies a capillary-meniscus focusing model.
Their individual records now retain complete available authors and identifiers.

Add [Brown, Kattamis, and Arnold (2011)](10.1007_s10404-011-0787-4.md).
E: time-resolved images distinguish external jets, re-entrant jets, and blister actuation.
Place this beside the lesson's mechanism-classification table.
The apparatus uses thin liquid films and absorbing layers.

Add [Brown, Brasz, Ventikos, and Arnold (2012)](10.1017_jfm.2012.337.md).
E: measured blister motion supplies the spatial boundary forcing.
The model is compared with jet shape and released volume.
I: the project should identify its moving outlet boundary before mapping pressure to external flow.
Premises: the lesson separates spherical pressure from spatial jet launch; this study measures the launch boundary.

Add [He and colleagues (2026)](10.1007_s42241-026-0020-2.md).
E: agarose-boundary experiments compare stiffness and bubble separation.
Place this beside elastic-boundary and jet-direction discussions.
The geometry contains a bubble adjacent to a gel boundary.

## Chapter 2 — Optical heating and finite PFC inventory

Existing optical evidence includes [Strohm (2011)](10.1364_BOE.2.001432.md).
Existing gel evidence includes [Abeid (2024)](10.1016_j.jmbbm.2024.106776.md).
Existing reuse evidence includes [Zhao (2023)](10.3390_nano13152238.md).
E: these studies identify formulations, activation measurements, and environmental effects.
Use their conditions when explaining material-specific activation.

Add [Schoppink, Alvarez-Chavez, and Fernandez Rivas (2024)](10.1063_5.0186998.md).
E: continuous-wave water heating connects beam size, incubation, and bubble evolution.
Its author preprint contains experimental and heat-transfer methods.
Place it beside absorption, heat diffusion, and energy bookkeeping.
The continuous-wave water regime differs from pulsed PFC activation.

Add [Linz, Freidank, Liang, and Vogel (2025)](10.1088_1361-6633_adedb3.md).
E: plasma photography and scattering examine optical breakdown in water.
Place it beside the laser-source mechanism distinction.
Its journal year is 2025; the author manuscript was revised in 2026.
Breakdown energy fractions require matching pulse and plasma conditions.

Add [Saleem, Versluis, and Lajoinie (2024)](arxiv_2404.17457.md).
E: the model couples finite-droplet vaporization with heat transfer and bubble motion.
The abstract describes analytical-limit validation.
Experiments: Unverified.
Its modeled system is water in oil.
PFC and gel use requires new property and constitutive validation.

Add [Chaudhary and colleagues (2025)](10.1021_acs.langmuir.4c05030.md).
E: microscopy compares PFH shell formulations after ultrasound activation.
Place it beside shell-state and interface assumptions.
“Optical characterization” describes imaging; activation is acoustic.

## Chapter 3 — Arrays, finite jets, and measurable impact

The [Bremond array citation](10.1103_PhysRevLett.96.224501.md) is preserved.
?: its primary methods remain unread in this pass.
The [Supponen shock study](10.1103_PhysRevFluids.2.093601.md) has an author preprint.
E: shadowgraphy and hydrophone measurements distinguish collapse shock events.
These belong beside the array-interaction and load-observer discussions.

Add [Boutopoulos and colleagues (2014)](10.1007_s10404-013-1248-z.md).
E: release-layer-assisted and direct silver-ink irradiation produce different jetting behavior.
Its imaging also examines deposited satellites.
Place it beside coherence, breakup, and the printing window.
The issue year is 2014; online publication occurred in 2013.

Add [Abeid and colleagues (2025)](10.1021_acsami.5c11300.md).
E: simultaneous observations separate bubble expansion, payload motion, and acoustic output.
Place it beside the lesson's distinct measured observables.
The study uses ultrasound activation in fibrin hydrogels.
Its payload velocities require separate interpretation from external transfer jets.

I: compare cavity motion, payload motion, and receiver loading separately.
Premises: Brown resolves launch mechanisms; Abeid resolves distinct transport observables.
This is a proposed measurement design for the project.

## Chapter 4 — Fracture and transfer

[Feng and colleagues (2007)](10.1021_la701555n.md) has reviewed primary methods.
E: peel experiments measure which interface fails as separation speed changes.
Use it for interface competition and rate dependence.
The source parameters belong to PDMS, gold, and treated glass.

[Li and colleagues (2024)](10.1073_pnas.2318739121.md) supports composite-stamp transfer.
E: its abstract reports water-vapor inflation and silicon-platelet demonstrations.
Use it for pressure–deformation–release coupling.
The stamp is sealed and layered.

Brown (2012) and Boutopoulos (2014) supply complementary liquid-printing evidence.
I: match the payload and release route before selecting a transfer benchmark.
Premises: Li transfers solid platelets; the liquid-film studies print ink.

Add [Verit and colleagues (2022)](10.3390_ijms23126636.md).
E: femtosecond cavitation creates channels inside collagen microfibres.
Confocal microscopy and viability assays assess processing outcomes.
Place it beside channel formation and geometry-dependent damage.
PFC-powered channel reliability: Not established.
Missing: formulation-specific outlet and transfer measurements.

## Appendix A — Hydrogel versus liquid

[Gaudron (2015)](10.1017_jfm.2015.7.md) supplies intact finite-strain cavity mechanics.
[Brujan (2001)](10.1017_S0022112000003347.md) supplies adjacent elastic-boundary experiments.
[Abeid (2024)](10.1016_j.jmbbm.2024.106776.md) supplies optical PFC-in-gel observations.
E: their geometry and material assumptions differ.
Retain those differences when discussing confinement and damage.

Add [Bremer-Sai and colleagues (2026)](10.1007_s11340-026-01332-z.md).
E: repeated laser events modify the surrounding material before later cycles.
The study compares polyacrylamide, gelatin, and collagen networks.
Its fitted modulus is an effective damage proxy.
Place it beside reset, reuse, and constitutive-state assumptions.
I: record first-event and conditioned-event performance separately.
Premise: later experimental cycles interrogate a modified near-field zone.

[Turkoz and colleagues (2018)](10.1063_1.5060717.md) demonstrates same-spot silver-paste printing.
E: rheology modification permits donor-film replenishment.
Gel recovery: Not established.
Missing: waiting-time and repeatability measurements for the project gel.

## Remaining project evidence

Published studies support specific mechanisms and measurement choices.
Project activation and repeatable transfer remain unvalidated.
Missing: the actual PFC formulation and absorber distribution.
Missing: cavity, outlet, jet, and payload trajectories.
Missing: receiver pressure–time or force–time measurements.
Missing: interface fracture parameters and gel recovery histories.
No numerical maximum or scientific stage status was revised.

## Reading order

1. Brown (2011): distinguish observed jet mechanisms.
2. Strohm (2011) and Abeid (2024): identify optical/PFC conditions.
3. Brown (2012): connect measured boundaries to spatial launch.
4. Boutopoulos (2014): connect jet dynamics with deposited quality.
5. Feng (2007) and Li (2024): identify the release interface.
6. Bremer-Sai (2026): assess conditioned gel and reuse.